Grants for Watershed Associations 2026: EPA 319 and More
Quick Answer: If you're running a watershed association, lake association, river council or creek friends group, your grant sources are EPA Section 319 nonpoint source money passed through your state, Reclamation's WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management Program in 19 western states ($50,000 to $300,000 per award)…
Full answer and how we checked it
If you're running a watershed association, lake association, river council or creek friends group, your grant sources are EPA Section 319 nonpoint source money passed through your state, Reclamation's WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management Program in 19 western states ($50,000 to $300,000 per award), the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation's Five Star program, and private foundations that report giving on IRS Form 990-PF. According to USAspending.gov (opens in a new tab), EPA's Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants obligated about $99.8 million to states, territories and tribes in FY2025.
Data note: Foundation counts come from Grantsights analysis of IRS Form 990-PF grant records tagged to environment and conservation, grouped by recipient state and pulled October 29, 2026, with filings mostly from tax years 2023 through 2025. The environment cause covers 48 state groups. Federal totals are USAspending.gov obligations by fiscal year.
In this guide (11 sections)
- $99.8 Million in 319 Money Runs Through Your State
- WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management: For Western Watershed Groups
- NFWF Five Star: Restoration With a Community Twist
- 4 Project Types and Where Each Gets Funded
- Which Foundations Fund Watershed Groups: What 990-PF Filings Show
- What EPA Doesn't Tell You About Funding a Watershed Group
- Common Mistakes in Watershed Grant Requests
- A 12-Month Watershed Association Funding Calendar
- Related Guides for Conservation Groups
- FAQ: Common Questions
- Sources
Foundations near you already fund this work. See three in your state that take requests, with how to apply. Free, about a minute.
Foundations that fund this work
16,598 private foundations gave to land trusts, conservancies, nature centers and environmental groups
From their own IRS Form 990-PF filings (tax years 2020 to 2025). Pick your state to see who gave there, with one foundation in full. About the list
Across the US, these foundations gave 87,724 grants totaling $6,551,015,300.
Historical giving does not establish an open application or eligibility for your organization. For-profit operators should check each foundation's applicant rules before buying.
The full list names all 16,598, state by state: what each gave, to whom, for what, and a link to its filings. One payment, no subscription.
Watershed groups are funded more like small conservation agencies than like charities. Public money comes for specific restoration and planning work; foundations pay for monitoring, education and the staff who hold partnerships together.
Watershed source review, Grantsights, October 29, 2026: Grantsights checked EPA's 319 Grant Program page (opens in a new tab), Reclamation's Cooperative Watershed Management Program page (opens in a new tab) and its notice on Grants.gov (opens in a new tab), NFWF's 2026 Five Star request for proposals, USAspending.gov totals and 990-PF filings naming watershed groups. Where official sources stop: EPA describes grants to states. It doesn't tell a volunteer lake association how to get a project into the state's plan.
$99.8 Million in 319 Money Runs Through Your State
According to EPA's 319 Grant Program page (opens in a new tab), states, territories and tribes receive Section 319 grant money that supports technical assistance, financial assistance, education, training, technology transfer, demonstration projects and monitoring of nonpoint source projects. Nonpoint source pollution is polluted runoff from farms, streets, lawns and eroding banks, which is exactly the problem most watershed groups work on.
| Federal water program | Assistance listing | FY2024 obligations | FY2025 obligations | Paid to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants (Section 319) | 66.460 | $117.7 million | $99.8 million | States, territories, tribes |
| Cooperative Watershed Management (WaterSMART) | 15.554 | $8.1 million | $7.1 million | Watershed groups and sponsors |
Figures are USAspending.gov (opens in a new tab) obligations.
The local route runs through your state's nonpoint source program, usually in the environmental quality or natural resources agency. Ask three questions: does the state fund local projects with 319 money, does it require a watershed-based plan before funding implementation, and when does its next request for proposals open? EPA's nonpoint source site has a section on using a watershed approach, so ask how your state's plan rules connect to it.
If your watershed has no current plan, writing one is often the first fundable project, and it can unlock implementation money later.
Get grant deadline alerts by email
About once a week, we email a short list of open grant calls with real deadlines from different funders. It isn't limited to the programs in this guide.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management: For Western Watershed Groups
According to Reclamation's program page (opens in a new tab), the Cooperative Watershed Management Program funds watershed groups to develop local solutions to water management needs. Reclamation defines a watershed group as a self-sustaining, non-regulatory, consensus-based group with a diverse mix of stakeholders, and says it funds group development, restoration planning and project design for up to $100,000 a year for up to three years with no cost share. Implementation projects are funded through a separate Reclamation opportunity, Enhancing Water Resources Projects.
Specifically, the current notice on Grants.gov (opens in a new tab) estimates $25,000,000 for about 100 awards:
| R26AS00349 detail | Value |
|---|---|
| Award range | $50,000 to $300,000 |
| Estimated awards | 100 |
| Rounds | October 7, 2026 (passed); February 24, 2027; September 1, 2027; February 15, 2028 |
| Eligible locations | Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wyoming and several territories |
| Existing groups | Must meet the Cooperative Watershed Management Act definition and be legally incorporated as a nonprofit |
| New groups | May be sponsored by a state, tribe, local or special district, nonprofit or university |
The notice says a watershed group must represent diverse stakeholders and make decisions on a consensus basis. If your association is mostly lakefront owners, recruiting farmers, water districts, local government and recreation interests strengthens both eligibility and your proposal. Groups in other states aren't eligible.
NFWF Five Star: Restoration With a Community Twist
The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation's Five Star program funds local partnerships for wetland, forest, riparian and coastal habitat restoration, stormwater management, outreach and stewardship. NFWF says it has funded more than 1,000 projects through the program, with more than $30.6 million in grants leveraging more than $96.1 million in other funds or donated services.
| 2026 Five Star request for proposals | Value |
|---|---|
| Award range | $30,000 to $150,000 |
| Expected grants | 30 to 40 a year |
| Match | At least 1:0.75 in non-federal contributions, which can include in-kind |
| Eligible | Nonprofit 501(c) organizations, state agencies, local governments, tribes, educational institutions |
| Geography | Priority cities and counties in about 39 states |
| 2026 deadline | June 4, 2026 (passed) |
The geography rule is the catch. Check NFWF's list of priority places before you write; a strong project outside them is a long shot.
4 Project Types and Where Each Gets Funded
Watershed work splits into four kinds of projects, and public and private funders each favor different ones.
| Project type | Examples | Public sources | Private sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planning | Watershed-based plans, restoration plans, project design | State 319 programs; WaterSMART in the West | Community foundations |
| Restoration and implementation | Streambank stabilization, riparian buffers, wetland work, stormwater practices | State 319 programs, NFWF Five Star in priority places, Reclamation's implementation funding in the West | Conservation foundations |
| Monitoring | Water sampling, volunteer monitoring programs, data management | State programs that accept volunteer data | Lake protection and family foundations |
| Education and stewardship | Student monitoring, youth paddling, workshops for landowners | NFWF Five Star education priorities | Youth, recreation and environmental education funders |
The 990-PF examples above lean toward the last two rows, education and lake protection. Public programs lean toward the first two. A balanced budget asks each side for what it likes to fund.
Making monitoring data count
Volunteer monitoring is only useful to a state if it meets the state's data standards. Ask your state water quality agency whether it accepts volunteer data and what quality assurance plan it requires. Data the state can use can inform the planning decisions that later bring restoration money to your watershed.
Working with landowners
Restoration on private land needs signed agreements: access, maintenance responsibilities and how long the practice stays in place. Draft a simple agreement template with your state program's guidance, and keep copies with every grant file. Funders and state staff will ask for them.
Which Foundations Fund Watershed Groups: What 990-PF Filings Show
Grantsights counted 87,436 environment and conservation grants across 48 state groups in 990-PF records pulled October 29, 2026. According to IRS rules, private foundations list every grant on IRS Form 990-PF (opens in a new tab), and watershed, lake and river groups show up by name in the recipient and purpose lines.
These tax year 2025 grants went to watershed, lake and river groups:
| Grantor | Watershed group | State | Amount | Purpose recorded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norman J Fisher and Doris Fisher Foundation | Watershed Stewards Academy | MD | $254,000 | Help build a healthier community life |
| Norcross Foundation | Walloon Lake Trust and Conservancy | MI | $250,000 | Preserve and protect lake and watershed |
| Burt Foundation | Tip of the Mitt Watershed | MI | $75,000 | Use consistent with 501(c)(3) status |
| Jane S Heman Foundation | Clark Fork Coalition | MT | $50,000 | Education of the Clark Fork watershed |
| National Recreation Foundation | West Atlanta Watershed Alliance | GA | $30,000 | Youth outdoor recreation programs |
| Meerwarth Family Foundation | The Great Swamp Watershed Association | NJ | $15,000 | Environmental |
| Hank and Lynn Hopeman Foundation | Lake Sunapee Protective Association | NH | $12,500 | Preserve and protect the lake's environmental quality |
| William and Joanne Moeller Foundation | Canyonlands Watershed Council | UT | $10,000 | Education |
| Donald Brian Miselis Foundation | Copper River Watershed Project | AK | $5,000 | Environmental restoration |
Notice the purposes: education, youth recreation and lake protection, not only restoration. Funders who won't pay for engineering may pay for water quality monitoring with students or a youth paddling program.
State counts for the environment cause:
| Watershed group's state | Environment grants | Foundations that gave | Say they take requests | Median grant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | 2,001 | 588 | 156 | $10,000 |
| Michigan | 1,867 | 557 | 170 | $5,000 |
| Oregon | 1,771 | 524 | 172 | $10,000 |
| Maine | 1,757 | 539 | 155 | $5,000 |
| New Jersey | 1,639 | 474 | 143 | $5,000 |
| Montana | 1,430 | 476 | 139 | $10,000 |
| Georgia | 1,406 | 517 | 148 | $6,000 |
| Tennessee | 886 | 319 | 112 | $7,000 |
| New Hampshire | 867 | 329 | 117 | $3,500 |
| Utah | 602 | 219 | 55 | $5,000 |
Get the funder list for your state
Watershed associations can check the Grantsights environment and conservation funder list for their state at no cost; funders that accept requests are listed first, along with who they've funded lately. Look for gifts to land trusts, lake associations, riverkeepers and nature centers near you. One $29 payment unlocks every state's full list; the $99 plan covers all cause lists for a year; both are refundable in full within 30 days.
What EPA Doesn't Tell You About Funding a Watershed Group
These 4 points come from reading EPA, Reclamation and NFWF rules side by side.
- Plans can unlock money. If your state ties implementation funding to a watershed plan, fund the plan first.
- Match is everywhere. NFWF asks for at least 1:0.75; many state programs ask for match too. Volunteer monitoring hours and landowner contributions can count. Track them from day one.
- Landowners are the project. Many nonpoint source fixes happen on private land. Signed landowner commitments are the strongest attachment you can include.
- Monitoring data is your currency. Years of consistent water quality data show funders the problem and the results. Protect that program even in lean years.
The honest view: 319 money is competitive and slow, Reclamation's program only serves the West, and Five Star targets priority places. For many associations, a base of local foundation and member support pays for the staff time needed to chase public grants.
Common Mistakes in Watershed Grant Requests
Check drafts against these 5 points.
- Applying for implementation before planning. A common mistake that state reviewers catch quickly.
- A stakeholder list that's all one interest. For WaterSMART, a group without diverse members may not meet the definition. That's a red flag.
- Underestimating match. Underestimate the cost share and the award becomes a burden.
- No measurable results. Report pounds of sediment or nutrients reduced when your state provides a method, plus feet of streambank restored and volunteers trained.
- Registration gaps. Federal and pass-through awards need a Unique Entity ID. See the SAM.gov registration guide.
A 12-Month Watershed Association Funding Calendar
| Months | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Call your state nonpoint source coordinator about 319 rounds and plan rules |
| 2 to 3 | Western groups: decide whether to apply to WaterSMART by February 24, 2027 |
| 4 | Check NFWF's next Five Star priority places |
| 5 to 7 | Send requests to 15 foundations that gave to land trusts, lakes or rivers nearby |
| 8 to 9 | Line up landowner agreements and match commitments |
| 10 to 12 | Report monitoring results and restoration totals to every funder |
Grantsights' how to write a grant letter of inquiry, how to read a 990-PF and grants for water quality guides support this work. The Grantsights grant database lists open EPA and Interior notices.
Related Guides for Conservation Groups
These 6 pages cover funders that overlap with watershed work. Watershed associations share funders with grants for land trusts, grants for nature centers, grants for environmental nonprofits and grants for clean water. Agricultural partners may find help in conservation grants for farmers. Historic riverside burial grounds can need the same erosion work; see grants for cemetery associations.
FAQ: Common Questions
Can a watershed association apply to EPA for 319 money? Not directly; 319 funds go to states, territories and tribes.
What is the WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management Program? A Reclamation program for western watershed groups, with awards of $50,000 to $300,000.
What is the NFWF Five Star program? A restoration and stewardship program with 2026 awards of $30,000 to $150,000.
Do private foundations fund watershed groups? Yes, from $5,000 to $254,000 in the tax year 2025 examples above.
How big is a typical foundation grant to environmental causes? Medians run $3,500 to $10,000 in the states shown.
Sources
- EPA: 319 Grant Program for States and Territories (opens in a new tab)
- Bureau of Reclamation: Cooperative Watershed Management Program (opens in a new tab)
- Grants.gov: R26AS00349 WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management Program (opens in a new tab)
- NFWF: Five Star Program 2026 Request for Proposals (opens in a new tab)
- USAspending.gov award search (opens in a new tab)
- IRS: About Form 990-PF (opens in a new tab)
Last updated October 29, 2026. Published by Grantsights from public sources. See our editorial policy, how we build and check guides, corrections and how we make money.
Related Guides
Complete Guide
Federal Grants for Nonprofits 2026: Where to Apply
Federal grants for nonprofits 2026: nonprofits got $42.7B in direct federal grants in FY2025, $25.4B from HHS. How to register, apply, and win subgrants.
Grants for Cemetery Associations 2026: What Actually Pays
Grants for cemetery associations in 2026: federal money is scarce, Washington and Florida offer up to $50,000, and foundations face IRS limits.
Grants for Lake Associations 2026: 319, State and Private
Grants for lake associations in 2026: EPA 319 sent $99.8 million to states in FY2025, Wisconsin's lake grants close November 16, and 990-PF funders help.
Grants for Neighborhood Associations 2026: What Works
Grants for neighborhood associations in 2026: most aren't 501(c)(3)s, so city funds like Seattle's $50,000 match and fiscal sponsors are the usual route.
Amber Grant 2026: Rules, $15 Fee, Grants for Women
The Amber Grant gives three $15,000 grants a month plus three $75,000 year-end grants, for a $15 fee. Other real grants for women, and scam signs.
Federal Grants for HBCUs 2026: Find Federal Funding
Compare 6 federal funding routes for HBCUs, from Title III Part B formula aid to NIH RCMI, DOD HBCU/MI, and USDA 1890 capacity grants.