Skip to content

Head Start Winners and Award History

By GrantsightsUpdated 5 official sourcesHow we checkCorrections

Quick Answer: Head Start winner history should start with HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.600, but award history is not the same as an open application route.

Full answer and how we checked it

TAGGS showed $56.601B in total assistance for Assistance Listing 93.600 (FY2008 to present) and a FY2026 subtotal of $11.566B when checked on October 10, 2026. The first visible 2026 rows included Kawerak, Inc. ($6,403,997), Rural Alaska Community Action Program ($9,389,087), Chugachmiut ($3,864,156), and Mobile Community Action Inc. ($12,151,090). New applicants still need a real OHS service-area opportunity.

This guide is for: Community Action Agencies, school districts, tribal organizations, nonprofit childcare operators, faith-based providers, and grant writers checking Head Start winners before deciding whether an open service-area competition is worth pursuing.

Data note: Grantsights checked HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.600, HeadStart.gov grant funding pages, Office of Head Start grant guidance, DRS guidance, and SAM.gov assistance-listing context on June 18, 2026, and rechecked the TAGGS totals and Alaska rows on October 10, 2026. TAGGS rows are award actions, not automatically open service-area competitions.

In this guide (12 sections)
Head Start source signalPublic source readApplicant meaning
Assistance listing93.600TAGGS is the main HHS award-action trail
TAGGS total assistance (FY2008 to present, Oct. 10, 2026)$56,601,186,268Public history is large, but still an award-action trail
FY2026 subtotal (Oct. 10, 2026)$11,565,732,511Current-year action rows need source-unit reading
Kawerak visible FY2026 row$6,403,997 (was $5,491,130 on June 18)Current rows can change between checks
Required match rule80% federal share in Head Start Act contextApplicants need non-federal share planning

According to HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.600 (opens in a new tab), public rows include funding fiscal year, recipient name, state, award number, award title, and action amount. TAGGS showed $56,601,186,268 in total assistance for Assistance Listing 93.600 and a FY2026 subtotal of $11,565,732,511 when checked on October 10, 2026, up from $8,096,163,895 on June 18 as more FY2026 actions posted. According to HeadStart.gov grant funding resources (opens in a new tab), Head Start programs are funded through federal grants. According to the Office of Head Start grants page (opens in a new tab), grant recipients provide services under the Head Start Program Performance Standards and the Head Start Act. According to the Head Start DRS page (opens in a new tab), open competition occurs when DRS conditions apply to a service area.

Where official sources stop: TAGGS shows who received award actions. OHS pages explain funding and DRS. Neither source tells a new organization whether there is an open service area, whether the organization can meet standards, or whether another early-childhood route is safer. This guide adds that decision screen.

Head Start winner history is more useful for scale and operator pattern than for opportunity discovery. A winner table can show who receives Head Start funding, but a new applicant still needs a posted service-area competition.

8 Head Start Recipient Rows Visible In 2026 TAGGS

This table shows selected TAGGS rows checked June 18, 2026, with the Kawerak, Rural Alaska Community Action Program, and Dena Nena Henash amounts updated on October 10, 2026. It is a public sample, not the full export.

Funding FYRecipientStateAward numberAward titleTAGGS action amount
2026Rural Alaska Community Action Program Inc.AK10CH012690Head Start and Early Head Start$9,389,087
2026ChugachmiutAK90CI010151Head Start and Early Head Start$3,864,156
2026Kenaitze Indian TribeAK90CI010201AIAN Head Start and AIAN Early Head Start$2,586,253
2026Kawerak, Inc.AK90CI010205AIAN Head Start and Early Head Start$6,403,997
2026Dena Nena HenashAK90CI010168AIAN Head Start and AIAN Early Head Start$3,423,699
2026Mobile Community Action Inc.AL04CH012303Head Start and Early Head Start$12,151,090
2026Community Action Partnership of North Alabama, Inc.AL04CH013055Head Start and Early Head Start$26,277,247
2026Talladega-Clay-Randolph Child Care Corp.AL04CH012582Head Start and Early Head Start$11,020,137

The table shows why Head Start is an operating commitment, not a small project grant. The visible rows include tribal organizations, Community Action Agencies, and local operators with multi-million dollar service responsibilities.

According to the TAGGS page checked on October 10, 2026, the FY2026 subtotal was $11,565,732,511. That does not mean a new applicant has an open route to that amount. It means the assistance-listing history is large and must be filtered by service area, award year, action type, and current competition status.

Next route: Pair this page with the Head Start grant program guide, Head Start grants 2026 guide, child care center grants, best childcare provider grants, and nonprofit grants.

Looking for your next grant?

About once a week, we email a short list of open grant calls with real deadlines from different funders. It lists open calls only.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

What The Winner Pattern Means For Applicants

PatternApplicant readAction before writing
Multi-million dollar rows are commonHead Start is an operating system, not a classroom add-onTest facilities, staffing, governance, and match
Tribal and AIAN rows appearTribal routes are visible and have distinct service needsCheck the exact OHS package
Community Action Agencies appear oftenEstablished anti-poverty operators remain a major recipient typeCompare local incumbent and service area
Head Start and Early Head Start titles appear togetherMixed-age service design can matterConfirm ages, slots, and delivery model
$0 or small actions can appearAward-action rows need interpretationDo not sum rows without award-detail review

The bad fit is a childcare provider that sees a large TAGGS amount and starts drafting without an open service-area package. The better fit is an organization with a posted OHS competition, facilities, health partners, family-governance plan, fiscal systems, and non-federal share documentation.

For example, one preschool operator with strong classrooms but no service-area opening should wait or pursue state childcare, CCDF pass-through, or foundation support. One Community Action Agency with a named OHS package, Head Start-ready governance, and match commitments may be ready to write.

What Head Start Winner Lists Don't Tell You

SourceWhat it provesWhat it does not decide
HHS TAGGS 93.600 (opens in a new tab)Recipient rows, award numbers, action amountsWhether a new applicant can apply now
HeadStart.gov grant funding (opens in a new tab)Federal grant funding contextLocal service-area opportunity
OHS grants page (opens in a new tab)Recipient responsibility under standards and lawWhether the applicant can operate at scale
Head Start DRS (opens in a new tab)Why some grants open for competitionWhether a specific service area is open today
SAM.gov Assistance Listing 93.600 (opens in a new tab)Federal assistance-listing contextLocal readiness, partners, or match

Grantsights data adds the public source screen: award-action caveat, recipient-type pattern, service-area warning, and apply, wait, or skip guidance.

6 Apply, Wait, Or Skip Checks

DecisionPass signalStop signal
Apply nowOHS has an open package for your service areaNo matching geography exists
WaitFacilities, governance, match, or partners need workDeadline leaves no time to build them
PartnerIncumbent or applicant needs childcare, health, or family-service partnersYou want to be prime without capacity
Use another childcare routeNeed is startup childcare, subsidy, or facilitiesHead Start standards exceed the need
Use school or state fundsDistrict or state pre-K is a better fitOHS route is not open
Skip for nowBoard cannot own a five-year operating commitmentOrganization only wants a small project grant

5 Service-Area Screens Before A Head Start Draft

According to HeadStart.gov, DRS competition is tied to one or more DRS conditions. That means award history is useful only after the service-area screen. A provider cannot apply nationwide because TAGGS shows thousands of award-action rows.

ScreenWhat to confirmWhy it matters
Open packageOHS package, geography, slots, and close dateNo package means no prime application route
Entity eligibilityPublic agency, nonprofit, school district, Tribal, or other allowed entityIndividuals and sole proprietors are not the route
Match planNon-federal share or waiver basisMissing match can break the budget
FacilitiesClassrooms, health space, kitchens, and safe sitesHead Start is an operating model
GovernancePolicy Council and board rolesFamily governance is not optional

For example, one Alabama Community Action Agency in the TAGGS sample had a $26.3M action row. Applicant read: Head Start can fund large local operations, but only for organizations ready to operate the full model. One small childcare center with 2 classrooms and no service-area NOFO should compare the child care center grants and childcare provider grants routes instead of starting a Head Start prime application.

According to SAM.gov's Assistance Listing 93.600, Head Start is a federal assistance program with defined program purpose and recipient responsibilities. According to OHS, grant recipients must operate under Head Start standards and law. Those facts should push a board conversation before any grant writer is hired.

4 Recipient Lessons From The 2026 TAGGS Sample

According to TAGGS, Alaska and Alabama recipients appeared heavily in the first visible rows checked by Grantsights. That does not mean those states have more open competitions. It reflects the current sorting and paging of award-action rows.

The first lesson is that recipient type matters. Tribal organizations, school districts, Community Action Agencies, and nonprofit operators can all appear, but each has a different proof burden.

The second lesson is that award size changes management risk. A $12M or $26M Head Start action is not a grant-writing trophy. It is a staff, facilities, compliance, monitoring, and family-services obligation.

The third lesson is that Early Head Start and Head Start can appear in the same row. Applicants need to confirm age range, service model, slots, and program option before budgeting.

The fourth lesson is that award-action history should be paired with current OHS locator work. A row from TAGGS does not replace the OHS package, Grants.gov forms, or local service-area facts. Use the Head Start grants 2026 guide for that application context.

3 Board Questions Before Pursuing Head Start

According to OHS guidance, Head Start grant recipients provide services under the Head Start Program Performance Standards. The board should answer three questions before authorizing a proposal.

First, can the organization operate the model for five years, not one project year? Second, can it document non-federal share, staff credentials, facilities, health partnerships, and family governance? Third, does it have a real service-area opening? If any answer is no, wait or use a narrower early-childhood funding route.

5 Concrete Recipient Reads From The Public Rows

According to HHS TAGGS, Mobile Community Action Inc. had a visible 2026 Head Start and Early Head Start action row for $12,151,090. A real-world example from that row is a Community Action Agency operating at a scale where classrooms, family services, health coordination, transportation, nutrition, governance, and federal reporting all need to work together. The applicant lesson is not that every Alabama nonprofit should apply. The lesson is that a Head Start prime role requires operating capacity before grant-writing capacity.

According to HHS TAGGS, Kawerak, Inc. had a visible 2026 AIAN Head Start and Early Head Start action row for $6,403,997 as of October 10, 2026. A real-world example from that row is a tribal or Alaska Native service context where geography, culture, staffing, and family engagement can shape the operating model. An applicant outside that context should not copy the amount. It should copy the source discipline: check the exact award title, service population, geography, and current OHS package.

According to HHS TAGGS, Kenaitze Indian Tribe had a visible 2026 AIAN Head Start and AIAN Early Head Start action row for $2,586,253. That row shows why recipient type is part of the applicant screen. Tribal and AIAN routes can have distinct local needs and administrative context. A non-tribal childcare provider should not use that row as a budget model.

According to HHS TAGGS, Community Action Partnership of North Alabama had a visible 2026 Head Start and Early Head Start action row for $26,277,247 in the June 18, 2026 check. That amount is large enough to change an organization's risk profile. A board should ask whether payroll, facilities, monitoring, procurement, and data systems can handle a program of that size. If the answer is no, a partnership role may be wiser than a prime application.

According to HHS TAGGS, Talladega-Clay-Randolph Child Care Corp. had a visible 2026 Head Start and Early Head Start action row for $11,020,137 in the June 18, 2026 check. The real-world example is a named local operator with an existing public award trail. A challenger organization in any service area needs to explain why families, partners, facilities, staff, and the transition plan will be stronger than the current or prior operator.

4 Source Checks That Stop A Bad Head Start Application

According to HeadStart.gov, grant funding resources direct programs to federal grant management and application materials. Use that only after the service area exists. A grant writer cannot manufacture geography, funded enrollment, or an OHS package.

According to the Office of Head Start, recipients provide services under federal standards and law. That should move the first meeting from "can we win money?" to "can we operate a Head Start program?" Strong Head Start applicants build the operating model before they write the narrative.

According to the DRS overview, competition is triggered by defined conditions for a grantee or service area. That means Head Start is not a rolling national early-childhood grant. If no DRS or underserved-area package is open, the next action is monitoring, partnership building, or another funding route.

According to SAM.gov Assistance Listing 93.600, Head Start is an assistance-listing program with a defined federal purpose. The listing helps confirm the program family, but it does not replace OHS's current locator, Grants.gov package, or service-area instructions.

For example, one rural school district with a local OHS package, health partners, buses, classrooms, family-service staff, and match documentation may be a strong entrant. One private childcare center with no match plan and no package should use the child care center grants, Head Start grants 2026, or nonprofit grants paths first.

How To Use This Page

This page gives the source method, selected TAGGS rows, recipient pattern, and route interpretation. It isn't a full TAGGS export.

Use it to decide whether Head Start belongs on the shortlist before leadership commits to an OHS package. The free grants search shows current Head Start opportunities.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I find Head Start winners?

Use HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.600 for public award-action rows, then check HeadStart.gov and the Office of Head Start funding locator for current service-area competitions.

What did the 2026 TAGGS Head Start rows show when checked?

The first visible rows included Alaska and Alabama recipients such as Kenaitze Indian Tribe, Kawerak, Mobile Community Action, and Community Action Partnership of North Alabama.

Does Head Start award history mean new applicants can apply anywhere?

No. New applicants usually need an open service-area competition through the Office of Head Start, often tied to the Designation Renewal System.

Why do some TAGGS Head Start rows show $0 or small action amounts?

TAGGS rows are award actions. They can include administrative or continuation actions, so a row amount is not always total annual program value.

Who should pursue Head Start funding?

Organizations with an open service area, Head Start-ready operations, governance, facilities, match plan, and capacity to meet performance standards.

Last updated October 10, 2026. Corrected October 10, 2026: what changed. Published by Grantsights from public sources. See our editorial policy, how we build and check guides, corrections and how we make money.