Skip to content

NSF GRFP Acceptance Rate: About 18% in 2026

By GrantsightsUpdated 14 official sourcesHow we checkCorrections

Quick Answer: The NSF GRFP acceptance rate was about 18% in 2026: NSF made offers for 2,500 fellowships from nearly 14,000 applicants.

Full answer and how we checked it

Another 1,470 applicants (about 10%) received Honorable Mention, which carries no money. Over the last decade NSF has offered roughly 2,000 to 2,600 fellowships a year from about 13,000 to 14,000 applications, a rate in the 15% to 20% range, except 2025, when the list shows only 1,500 offers. NSF estimates 1,500 awards for the 2027 competition.

This guide is for: undergraduate seniors, bachelor's degree holders and first-year graduate students weighing an NSF GRFP application, plus the advisors and fellowship offices who counsel them, who want the real acceptance rate and how it has moved year to year.

Data note: Offer and Honorable Mention counts come from a Grantsights pull of the official Research.gov GRFP awardee list (opens in a new tab) on November 2, 2026, one query per year and award type for 2015 to 2026, plus the list's own Excel export for the field counts. Applicant counts come only from NSF documents: the April 13, 2026 announcement (opens in a new tab), the FY2024 budget request (opens in a new tab) and the FY2025 budget request (opens in a new tab). Where NSF hasn't published an applicant count, this page doesn't estimate one. The Research.gov list can change after announcement day, so counts may differ slightly from NSF's press figures.

In this guide (11 sections)
Competition yearApplicants (NSF figure)Offers (NSF figure or Research.gov list)Acceptance rate
2026Nearly 14,0002,500 announced (2,597 on list)About 18%
2023About 13,0002,555 on listAbout 20%
2022About 13,0002,193 on listAbout 17%
2027 (estimate)Not yet published1,500 estimatedNot yet known

For the full program guide, eligibility rules and application advice, see the NSF GRFP guide. This page answers one question: how many applicants win, and how that number has changed.

What Is the GRFP Acceptance Rate in 2026?

About 18%. According to NSF's April 13, 2026 announcement (opens in a new tab), NSF made offers and will award 2,500 Graduate Research Fellowships for the 2026-2027 academic year, selected from "nearly 14,000 applicants." Divide 2,500 by 14,000 and you get 17.9%. Because NSF said "nearly," the true pool was a little under 14,000, so the real rate was a little above 17.9%.

NSF's GRFP additional FAQ (opens in a new tab) adds the second half of the result: "An additional 1,470 applicants were named as Honorable Mentions." That's about 10.5% of the pool. Put together, about 28% of 2026 applicants left with either an offer or an Honorable Mention, and about 72% received neither.

2026 outcomeCountShare of nearly 14,000 applicantsSource
Fellowship offers (announced)2,500About 17.9%NSF announcement
Honorable Mentions (announced)1,470About 10.5%NSF GRFP FAQ
Offer or Honorable Mention3,970About 28.4%Sum of the two
NeitherAbout 10,000About 71.6%Remainder
Offer records on Research.gov, Nov 2, 20262,597About 18.6%Research.gov list
Honorable Mention records on Research.gov, Nov 2, 20261,442About 10.3%Research.gov list

The list and the announcement don't match exactly. Research.gov showed 2,597 offer records and 1,442 Honorable Mention records when Grantsights pulled it on November 2, 2026. The safest reading is that NSF announced 2,500 fellowships and the public list carries a slightly larger set of offer records. Either way, the rate rounds to about 18%.

One more wrinkle: the denominator includes applications that never reached a reviewer. NSF's FAQ says that "each year, hundreds of applications" are returned without review for eligibility or formatting problems, and an NSF 101 post on GRFP (opens in a new tab) puts formatting returns alone at "over 800 applications" a year. So the acceptance rate among applications that were actually reviewed runs a bit higher than 18%.

Get research funding calls by email

About once a week, we email open research funding calls with a real deadline, from federal agencies such as NIH and NSF, picked for research institutions. One click to unsubscribe.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

GRFP Offers and Honorable Mentions by Year, 2015 to 2026

The Research.gov list is the only public year-by-year record of outcomes. Grantsights analysis of the list on November 2, 2026 counted 25,306 offer records across the 12 competitions from 2015 to 2026, an average of about 2,108 a year.

Competition yearOffer recordsHonorable Mention recordsChange in offers vs prior year
20152,0501,901
20162,0482,865-2
20172,0691,695+21
20182,0561,366-13
20192,0521,541-4
20202,0761,787+24
20212,0741,786-2
20222,1931,377+119
20232,555801+362
20242,0361,719-519
20251,5002,534-536
20262,5971,442+1,097

Three patterns stand out. From 2015 to 2021, offers barely moved, staying between 2,048 and 2,076. In 2022 and 2023 they rose, reaching 2,555 in 2023, the year NSF's FY2025 budget request (opens in a new tab) lists a plan of 2,500 new fellows. Since 2024 the count has swung hard: 2,036, then 1,500, then 2,597.

Honorable Mentions don't track offers. They ranged from 801 (2023) to 2,865 (2016). In 2023, when offers hit their high, Honorable Mentions hit their low, which fits a fixed pool where more of the near-misses became winners. In 2025 the reverse happened: offers fell to 1,500 and the list shows 2,534 Honorable Mentions.

Offers also aren't the same as fellows who start. NSF's FY2022 budget request (opens in a new tab) reports 2,007 new fellows in FY2020, and the FY2023 request (opens in a new tab) reports 2,005 in FY2021. The Research.gov list shows 2,076 and 2,074 offers for those years, so roughly 70 offers a year weren't converted into new fellows in NSF's budget count. People decline, defer or fail the enrollment check.

Acceptance Rate in Every Year NSF Published an Applicant Count

NSF doesn't publish a single table of applications by year. Grantsights checked NSF's announcements, solicitations, FAQs and budget requests from FY2022 to FY2027 and found applicant counts for three competition years, plus a general statement.

YearNSF applicant statementOffersAcceptance rateOffer or HM rate
2022"GRFP reviewed about 13,000 applications" (FY2024 budget request, on FY2022)2,193About 16.9%About 27.5%
2023"about 13,000 applications" (FY2025 budget request, on FY2023)2,555About 19.7%About 25.8%
2026"nearly 14,000 applicants" (April 13, 2026 announcement)2,500 announcedAbout 17.9%About 28.4%
General"nearly 14,000 applications are received for about 2,000 fellowships" (NSF 101 post)About 2,000About 14%Not stated

The 2022 and 2023 applicant statements are on federal fiscal years. GRFP applications are due in October and results come out in April, both inside the same fiscal year, so FY2022 lines up with the 2022 competition. For 2015 to 2021, 2024 and 2025, Grantsights didn't find an NSF-published applicant count and doesn't print a rate for those years. Rates you see elsewhere for those years usually come from university slide decks, not NSF.

The honest summary: in years NSF documents, roughly 1 in 5 or 6 applicants got an offer, and a little over 1 in 4 got an offer or an Honorable Mention.

Why the 2025 and 2026 Counts Moved So Much

2025: about 1,000 offers in April, 1,500 by June. The 2025 solicitation, NSF 24-591 (opens in a new tab), said NSF "will support up to 2,300 new Graduate Research Fellowships per fiscal year." The first round fell well short. C&EN reported that NSF made 1,000 offers in April 2025 and that on June 13, 2025, "504 applicants were suddenly pulled from the GRFP honorable mention list and offered fully-funded fellowships," bringing the total to 1,500. Research.gov now lists 1,500 offers for 2025. NSF didn't publish an applicant count for 2025, so the 2025 rate can't be stated from NSF figures, but against a pool anywhere near 13,000 it would be the lowest rate in this table.

2026: 2,500 announced, with tighter eligibility. For the 2026 competition, NSF 25-547 (opens in a new tab) revised eligibility, and NSF's FAQ spells out the two changes: an applicant "must not have completed more than one academic year in a graduate program," and "clinical psychology degree programs are no longer eligible." Second-year graduate students, who could apply under NSF 24-591, were cut from the pool. NSF 25-547 didn't give an estimated number of awards; NSF then announced 2,500 in April 2026.

Funding behind the swings. NSF's FY2027 budget request (opens in a new tab) shows $433.00 million for GRFP in the FY2025 current plan and requests $246.54 million for FY2027, a 43.1% cut. Its FY2026 request (opens in a new tab) had asked for $127.29 million, down 55.3% from $284.52 million. The budget documents don't break those dollars into new versus continuing fellows, so they don't map neatly onto offer counts.

The 2027 Outlook: 1,500 Awards Would Mean About 11%

The 2027 solicitation, NSF 26-526 (opens in a new tab), posted August 25, 2026, lists an "Estimated Number of Awards: 1,500." NSF's FY2027 budget request says, "In FY 2027, NSF intends to fund 1,500 new fellows." Applications closed October 19 to 23, 2026, and NSF says results arrive by early April; the GRFP results date guide covers that timeline.

2027 scenarioApplicantsAwardsAcceptance rate
Pool like 202614,0001,500About 10.7%
Pool like 2022 and 202313,0001,500About 11.5%
Smaller pool after eligibility cuts11,0001,500About 13.6%
If Congress funds more awards14,0002,000About 14.3%

These are arithmetic scenarios, not forecasts. NSF hasn't published a 2027 applicant count, and the 1,500 figure is an estimate that NSF ties to appropriations. NSF 26-526 also removed one field and several subfields for 2027, according to NSF's FAQ, and keeps the one-year limit for graduate applicants, so the pool could shrink. The common mistake is to plan around the 2026 rate. If NSF funds 1,500, the 2027 rate will be well below 2026's 18% unless the applicant pool drops by thousands.

Offers and Honorable Mentions by Field, 2023 to 2026

NSF doesn't publish applicants by field, so no one can give a true acceptance rate by field. What the Research.gov export does show is where the offers went. Grantsights counted the offer records by top-level field of study for the last four competitions.

Field (Research.gov top-level field)2023 offers2024 offers2025 offers2026 offers2026 share
Engineering69153240691335.2%
Life Sciences63849921448618.7%
Computer and Information Science and Engineering18215120826010.0%
Chemistry2241821542148.2%
Physics and Astronomy1751441661706.5%
Geosciences161134841656.4%
Social Sciences152126791244.8%
Mathematical Sciences1028356953.7%
Materials Research685563893.4%
Psychology13911256622.4%
STEM Education and Learning Research231814190.7%
Total2,5552,0361,5002,597100%

The shift is large. Engineering went from 27.0% of offers in 2023 to 35.2% in 2026. Life Sciences fell from 25.0% to 18.7%, and Psychology from 5.4% to 2.4%. Computer and information science rose from 7.1% to 10.0%. That matches NSF's stated emphasis: the 2027 solicitation says NSF "will continue to emphasize high priority research areas aligned with Administration priorities," and the 2026 FAQ refers to "national workforce demand in critical STEM fields."

The Honorable Mention list adds a second signal. In 2026, Grantsights counted how the recognized applicants in each field (offer plus Honorable Mention) split between the two outcomes.

Field, 2026OffersHonorable MentionsOffers as share of recognized
Engineering91312887.7%
Life Sciences48657345.9%
Computer and Information Science and Engineering2601893.5%
Chemistry21422448.9%
Physics and Astronomy17017149.9%
Geosciences16521543.4%
Social Sciences124496.9%
Psychology628741.6%

This isn't an acceptance rate, because applicants who got nothing aren't on either list. But it's a red flag for anyone in life sciences, chemistry, physics, geosciences or psychology: in 2026, more than half of the recognized applicants in those fields received Honorable Mention instead of money, while in engineering and computing almost every recognized applicant got an offer. In 2025 the split was even sharper for life sciences: 214 offers against 961 Honorable Mentions.

What NSF Doesn't Tell You About GRFP Odds

NSF doesn't publish acceptance rates by applicant level. Grantsights found no NSF table of applicants or awards by stage (undergraduate senior, bachelor's degree holder, first-year graduate student). The Research.gov list shows name, baccalaureate institution, field of study and current institution, not level, so the list can't be used to count it either. Anyone quoting a rate for seniors versus graduate students is using a non-NSF source.

The level rules changed, so older comparisons break. Under NSF 24-591, second-year graduate students could apply. Under NSF 25-547 and NSF 26-526, graduate applicants must be in the first year of their first graduate degree program, and NSF 26-526 says plainly that "Second-year graduate students are not eligible to apply." Undergraduate seniors and bachelor's holders who haven't enrolled in graduate school "can apply unlimited times before enrolling in a graduate degree program." For a senior, that means the real decision isn't one roll of the dice: a senior who misses can apply again as a bachelor's holder or once as a first-year graduate student.

Rates by field are guesses unless someone has applicant counts. The field tables above show where offers went, not how hard each field was. A field with many offers may simply have had many applicants.

Returned applications sit inside the denominator. Hundreds of applications a year never reach review. That's a cost you control. Read the page limits and eligible field lists in the solicitation twice, and don't propose research with direct health or disease goals, which NSF lists as ineligible.

An Honorable Mention isn't always final. In 2025, NSF converted 504 Honorable Mentions to fellowships in June. NSF also runs the EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (opens in a new tab), which funds institutions in EPSCoR jurisdictions to support students who received a GRFP Honorable Mention "within the last three years" at the GRFP rates of $37,000 stipend and $16,000 cost of education.

How To Use These Numbers Before You Apply

Here's how the acceptance rate should change a decision, by applicant type.

ApplicantWhat the numbers sayNext action
Undergraduate seniorAbout 18% in 2026, likely lower if 2027 funds 1,500; unlimited tries before grad schoolApply if your research plan and letters are ready; a miss isn't your last chance
Bachelor's holder not yet enrolledSame pool and odds; still unlimited tries before enrollingApply; use research experience since graduation as evidence
First-year graduate studentOne attempt only, in the first year of the first graduate degreeDon't apply until the plan is strong, because there's no second graduate-year try
Second-year graduate studentNot eligible under NSF 25-547 or NSF 26-526Skip GRFP; look at university fellowships, NIH F31 or advisor support
Applicant in life sciences, chemistry, physics, geosciences or psychology2026 offers went to under half of recognized applicants in these fieldsApply, but plan for an Honorable Mention outcome and line up a backup
Applicant proposing health or disease researchIneligible areas are returned without reviewWrong route; compare NIH fellowships such as the F31

For example, one applicant from a physics program who applies as a senior and receives Honorable Mention can apply again as a first-year graduate student, while one applicant who first applies in the first graduate year gets a single shot. The arithmetic favors applying early when the application is ready.

Students on the biomedical side of the line should look at NIH's route instead; the F31 success rates by institute show NIH's numbers. For writing advice, the Intellectual Merit guide and the Broader Impacts guide cover the two review criteria, and the GRFP winners and award history page shows what the awardee roster can and can't tell you about who wins. Faculty and labs looking past the fellowship can search NSF programs in the free NSF funding hub.

How the Data Was Pulled

On November 2, 2026, Grantsights submitted the public search form on the Research.gov GRFP awardee list (opens in a new tab) once for each competition year from 2015 to 2026 and each award type (Offered Award and Honorable Mention), with a pause between requests, and recorded the "Applicants found" count the form returned. For 2023 to 2026 offers and 2025 to 2026 Honorable Mentions, it downloaded the list's Excel export and counted records by the top-level field before the first hyphen in the "Field of Study" column.

Applicant counts were taken word for word from NSF documents and not adjusted. Rates were computed as offers divided by applicants and rounded to one decimal place. Where a document says "about" or "nearly," the rate is labeled "about."

What this method can't do: it can't see applicants who received neither outcome, it can't separate seniors from graduate students, and it reflects the list as of the pull date, which can change after announcements.

FAQ: Common Questions

What is the NSF GRFP acceptance rate?

About 18% in 2026: 2,500 offers from nearly 14,000 applicants. NSF budget documents put the 2022 and 2023 pools at about 13,000 applications each, giving about 17% for 2022 and about 20% for 2023.

How many people apply to the NSF GRFP each year?

Roughly 13,000 to 14,000, according to NSF's budget requests and its 2026 announcement. NSF hasn't published an exact count for every year.

What percentage of GRFP applicants get Honorable Mention?

About 10% in 2026, when NSF named 1,470 Honorable Mentions. About 28% of 2026 applicants received an offer or an Honorable Mention.

Why did the GRFP award fewer fellowships in 2025?

NSF made about 1,000 offers in April 2025 and added 504 in June by converting Honorable Mentions, for 1,500 in total. The solicitation had said NSF would support up to 2,300.

How many GRFP fellowships will NSF award in 2027?

NSF estimates 1,500 in NSF 26-526 and its FY2027 budget request. With a pool like 2026's, that would mean an acceptance rate near 11%.

Does NSF publish GRFP acceptance rates by field or by applicant level?

No. Research.gov shows offers and Honorable Mentions by field, but NSF doesn't publish applicants by field or by level, so true rates for those groups can't be calculated.

Sources

Last updated November 2, 2026. Published by Grantsights from public sources. See our editorial policy, how we build and check guides, corrections and how we make money.