Ryan White Winners and Award History
Quick Answer: Ryan White winner history must be split by 5 program parts.
Full answer and how we checked it
HRSA FY2025 tables show Part A awards (formula, supplemental, and Minority AIDS Initiative funding combined) to eligible metro areas, Part B formula and ADAP awards to states and territories, Part C Early Intervention Services awards to direct service providers, Part D awards for women, infants, children, and youth services with total awards of $71,303,531, and Part F Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) awards totaling $19,551,049, which is the SPNS total only, not all of Part F. A nonprofit should not read a Part A city row as proof it can apply directly to HRSA.
This guide is for: HIV service organizations, community health centers, health departments, clinics, hospitals, 340B teams, and nonprofit grant staff checking Ryan White award history before deciding whether to apply directly, pursue a subgrant, or wait.
Data note: Grantsights checked HRSA Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program FY2025 award pages for Parts A, B, C, D, and F on October 10, 2026. FY2025 tables were still the latest HRSA had posted. These are different source units. Formula awards, competitive direct awards, demonstration awards, and technical-assistance awards should not be treated as one interchangeable winner list.
In this guide (9 sections)
| Ryan White source unit | HRSA FY2025 example | Applicant meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Part A | New York, NY total shown as $89,662,231 | Local provider route is usually city or county subgrant |
| Part B | Nevada total shown as $12,824,768 | Provider route usually runs through state HIV program |
| Part C | HRSA page shows total awards of $182,283,411 | Direct route for eligible HIV early-intervention care providers |
| Part D | HRSA page shows total awards of $71,303,531 | Specialized women, infants, children, and youth route |
| Part F SPNS | HRSA SPNS page shows total awards of $19,551,049 (SPNS only; Part F also funds AETCs, dental, and MAI work) | Demonstration or technical-assistance route, not a general clinic grant |
According to HRSA's FY2025 Part A award table (opens in a new tab), eligible metropolitan and transitional grant areas receive a total award that combines formula, competitive supplemental, and Minority AIDS Initiative funding. New York's $89,662,231 total, for example, includes $52,163,140 in formula funding and $29,762,447 in supplemental funding. According to HRSA's FY2025 Part B award table (opens in a new tab), state and territory awards include base, ADAP, and other funding columns. According to HRSA's FY2025 Part C page (opens in a new tab), Early Intervention Services total awards were $182,283,411. According to HRSA's FY2025 Part D page (opens in a new tab), total awards were $71,303,531 for organizations serving women, infants, children, and youth. According to HRSA's FY2025 Part F SPNS page (opens in a new tab), SPNS total awards were $19,551,049 across demonstration, evaluation, dissemination, and technical-assistance roles.
Where official sources stop: HRSA award tables are strong public sources for who received funds. They do not decide whether your organization should apply to HRSA directly, chase a city or state subgrant, partner under another provider, or build clinical and reporting capacity first. This guide adds that route decision.
Ryan White award history is easy to misuse. Let the winner pattern change the route choice before it changes the grant narrative. The biggest mistake is treating the phrase "Ryan White winners" as one pool. The useful question is which part owns your route.
10 FY2025 Ryan White Award Rows To Read Separately
| Part | Recipient or jurisdiction | City or state | FY2025 amount shown | Source-unit meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Los Angeles | CA | $46,295,740 | Metro-area total (formula + supplemental + MAI) |
| A | New York | NY | $89,662,231 | Metro-area total (formula + supplemental + MAI) |
| A | Houston | TX | $27,558,403 | Metro-area total (formula + supplemental + MAI) |
| B | Minnesota | MN | $15,446,690 | State formula and ADAP-related award table |
| B | Nevada | NV | $12,824,768 | State formula and ADAP-related award table |
| C | HRSA Part C EIS table | National | $182,283,411 total awards | Direct service-provider award pool |
| D | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham, AL | $893,974 | Specialized Part D provider award |
| D | Maricopa County Special Health Care District | Phoenix, AZ | $680,985 | Specialized Part D provider award |
| F | Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore, MD | $4,248,857 | SPNS stigma project row |
| F | JSI Research and Training Institute, Inc. | Boston, MA | $2,000,000 | Dissemination-assistance row |
The table shows why source units matter. A community clinic should not copy New York's Part A award row and assume it has a direct federal route. A health department should not compare its formula allocation with a Part F demonstration award. A case-management nonprofit may have a stronger local subgrant path than a direct Part C application.
For example, a clinic with an active HIV panel, viral load suppression data, payer-of-last-resort controls, and Ryan White Services Report readiness may be a Part C candidate. A housing or transportation nonprofit in a Part A area may be a better fit for a local subgrant. A university evaluation team may fit a Part F role only when HRSA's specific SPNS question matches its skills.
Next route: Pair this award-history page with the Ryan White HIV grants guide, Ryan White program guide, HIV/AIDS grants guide, healthcare grants guide, grant search, and the free eligibility checker.
Looking for your next grant?
About once a week, we email a short list of open grant calls with real deadlines from different funders. It lists open calls only.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What The FY2025 Pattern Means
| Pattern | Applicant implication | Stop rule |
|---|---|---|
| Large Part A metro rows | Local providers need to know planning-council and grantee procurement cycles | Do not write a direct HRSA Part A application |
| Large Part B state rows | State HIV program contracts may matter more than Grants.gov | Do not skip the state route screen |
| Part C provider rows | Direct federal competition is possible for eligible HIV care providers | Do not apply without clinical and data capacity |
| Part D provider rows | Specialized population focus matters | Do not relabel general adult HIV work as Part D |
| Part F SPNS rows | Demonstration, evaluation, and technical assistance are distinct roles | Do not treat SPNS as a general services grant |
According to HRSA's Part F page, the SPNS table includes implementation assistance, evaluation, stigma, dissemination, demonstration sites, and housing-intervention roles. That does not mean every HIV service organization should chase SPNS. It means the role must match the NOFO.
What Official Sources Don't Tell You About Ryan White Winners
| Source | What it proves | What it does not decide |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 Part A awards (opens in a new tab) | Metro-area recipient rows with formula, supplemental, and MAI totals | Local provider procurement timing |
| FY2025 Part B awards (opens in a new tab) | State and territory award table | Which providers a state will fund |
| FY2025 Part C awards (opens in a new tab) | Direct EIS award table and total awards | Whether a clinic's HIV data is strong enough |
| FY2025 Part D awards (opens in a new tab) | Provider rows for women, infants, children, and youth services | Whether general HIV care belongs in Part D |
| FY2025 Part F SPNS awards (opens in a new tab) | Demonstration and support-role rows | Whether a provider can run the specific project role |
Winner history also does not show 340B readiness, payer-of-last-resort controls, clinical quality management strength, client-level reporting quality, or local service gaps. Those are the factors that decide whether an organization is ready.
Apply, Subgrant, Partner, Or Wait
| Decision | Use this route when | Stop signal |
|---|---|---|
| Apply directly for Part C | Existing HIV primary care, data, quality management, and payer controls are ready | Organization wants to start HIV care from scratch |
| Apply directly for Part D | Women, infants, children, youth, or perinatal HIV care is core work | Population focus is added only for grant fit |
| Pursue Part A subgrant | You serve an eligible metro area and match local service categories | You are trying to bypass local procurement |
| Pursue Part B subgrant | Your state HIV program funds your service category | The organization has not contacted the state HIV office |
| Partner under Part F | You match a demonstration, evaluation, or technical-assistance role | The role is outside your real delivery capacity |
| Wait | Data, 340B, compliance, or clinical systems need work | The grant would create a program the organization cannot run |
Map the organization to a Ryan White part before reading award amounts. A $4M Part F row is not better than a $500K Part C row if your organization is a clinic with no evaluation infrastructure. A large Part A row is not accessible unless the local grantee procures your service category.
8-Point Ryan White Winner Checklist
Use this checklist before turning a Ryan White winner row into a grant plan.
| Check | Strong evidence | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Program part | Part A, B, C, D, or F is named | Each part has a different applicant path |
| Applicant path | Direct HRSA, city subgrant, state subgrant, or partner role is clear | Award tables do not all mean direct access |
| Service model | Clinical care, support service, population focus, or demonstration role is proven | Reviewers need the right delivery model |
| Data readiness | RSR, viral load, retention, or program data is available where needed | Narrative cannot replace missing HIV data |
| Payer controls | Payer-of-last-resort process is documented | Ryan White funds cannot replace other payers |
| 340B posture | Covered entity or pharmacy plan is understood | Long-term sustainability often depends on this route |
| Local procurement | Part A or B subgrant timing is known | Local and state cycles differ from HRSA deadlines |
| Bad-fit warning | The organization knows when to wait or partner | Chasing the wrong part can cost a full cycle |
According to HRSA, FY2025 Part C Early Intervention Services total awards were $182,283,411. According to HRSA, New York's FY2025 Part A total was $89,662,231. According to HRSA, the University of Alabama at Birmingham Part D row showed $893,974. According to USASpending, Assistance Listing rows can provide another federal award-record trail, but they should be checked against HRSA part-level tables before interpretation.
The lesson is that a Ryan White winner row should change the route map. For example, one case-management nonprofit in a Part A city should first ask when the city grantee buys case management, transportation, housing, or food-support services. One clinic with HIV primary care and performance data can compare that with direct Part C. One university evaluation team should look for Part F SPNS roles only when the project role matches HRSA's specific question.
Source Maintenance Notes
Grantsights checked HRSA FY2025 Part A, B, C, D, and F award tables, plus USASpending source posture, on October 10, 2026. Recheck the HRSA part page before using a row in an application memo because a new fiscal year, continuation cycle, or competition can change the recipient table.
Award history is not enough for a compliance decision. Ryan White teams should still check HRSA NOFOs, local or state procurement pages, payer-of-last-resort requirements, 340B status, and client-level reporting rules before assigning writing time.
Where This Page Stops
This page gives HRSA source-unit splits, selected FY2025 recipient rows, route guidance, and source caveats. It doesn't cover local subgrant awards, which are decided by city and state grantees.
Use it to decide whether the phrase "Ryan White winners" matches your route. If your team is choosing between direct HRSA competition, a local subgrant, a state subgrant, or a partnership, the free eligibility checker and grants search are the next stop.
Sources
- HRSA FY2025 Ryan White Part A awards - ryanwhite.hrsa.gov (opens in a new tab)
- HRSA FY2025 Ryan White Part B awards - ryanwhite.hrsa.gov (opens in a new tab)
- HRSA FY2025 Ryan White Part C EIS awards - ryanwhite.hrsa.gov (opens in a new tab)
- HRSA FY2025 Ryan White Part D awards - ryanwhite.hrsa.gov (opens in a new tab)
- HRSA FY2025 Ryan White Part F SPNS awards - ryanwhite.hrsa.gov (opens in a new tab)
- USASpending award search - usaspending.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Grants.gov search - grants.gov (opens in a new tab)
Related Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
Where can I find Ryan White winners?
Use HRSA's Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program award pages by part. Part A, B, C, D, and F tables are different source units and should not be merged into one winner count.
Are Ryan White Parts A and B the same as Part C winners?
No. Parts A and B are mainly formula awards to cities, states, and territories. Part C is a competitive direct federal route for eligible HIV care providers.
What FY2025 Ryan White award examples did Grantsights check?
Grantsights checked HRSA FY2025 Part A, Part B, Part C, Part D, and Part F award pages, including recipient rows and total award amounts where HRSA published them.
Does a Ryan White winner table prove a nonprofit should apply?
No. The right route depends on whether the organization is a direct federal applicant, a local subgrantee, a clinical provider, a Part D population specialist, or a Part F demonstration partner.
What is the fastest Ryan White route for many nonprofits?
Often it is a local Part A or state Part B subgrant, not a direct HRSA Part C, D, or F competition.
Last updated October 10, 2026. Corrected October 10, 2026: what changed. Published by Grantsights from public sources. See our editorial policy, how we build and check guides, corrections and how we make money.
Related Guides
SAMHSA CCBHC Winners and Award History
SAMHSA CCBHC winners from TAGGS recipient rows, expansion-grant source checks, award amounts, state patterns, and fit guidance.
Ryan White HIV Grants 2026: Parts C, D, F Guide
HRSA's $2.57B Ryan White program funds HIV care through 5 parts. How nonprofits win competitive Parts C, D, and F grants directly.
Ryan White Grant Guide: Parts A-F & How to Apply
The Ryan White Program provides $2.5B+ to serve 602,000 people with HIV. Learn the 5 Parts, payor of last resort rules, and how to apply.
DOE Clean Energy Winners and Award History
DOE clean energy winners from OCED, EERE, Award Wednesday, and USASpending, including $3.9M and $4.9M award examples and route guidance.
EDA Public Works Winners and Award History
EDA Public Works winners from 2017-2020: $3.22M in sample awards, 506 jobs, private investment signals, source caveats, and apply or wait guidance.
EPA Environmental Justice Winners and Award History
EPA environmental justice winners, Community Change selected applications, recipient types, states, award ranges, and apply or skip guidance.