Skip to content

SAMHSA CCBHC Winners and Award History

By GrantsightsUpdated 6 official sourcesHow we checkCorrections

Quick Answer: SAMHSA CCBHC winner history should start with HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.696.

Full answer and how we checked it

The TAGGS page checked on October 9, 2026 showed $1,693,227,389 in total assistance for the listing since FY2008 and visible FY2026 actions for Southern California Health & Rehabilitation Program ($1,000,000), Aroostook Mental Health Services ($1,000,000), Berrien Mental Health Authority ($960,951), and Southeast Inc ($999,988). Those four are year-3 continuation actions on awards that began April 30, 2024 and run to April 29, 2028, not new FY2026 winners. The FY2026 new-award notices (SM-26-014 and SM-26-015) have closed, so confirm the next SAMHSA cycle before planning an application.

This guide is for: Behavioral health executives, nonprofit grant teams, CFOs, clinic operators, state partners, and consultants looking for SAMHSA CCBHC winners, public recipient rows, and the applicant lessons behind those awards.

Data note: Grantsights checked SAMHSA CCBHC pages, SAMHSA grant announcements, and HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.696 on October 9, 2026, and matched the FY2026 rows to USAspending award records. TAGGS rows are award actions. They are not always the same as total grant value, new-winner count, or clinic certification status.

In this guide (10 sections)
CCBHC source signalPublic source readApplicant meaning
Assistance listing93.696TAGGS is the main public HHS award-action trail
TAGGS listing total assistance checked (FY2008 to present)$1,693,227,389Aggregate listing scale is different from a single action row
TAGGS FY2026 subtotal$128,736,726FY2026 money so far is mostly continuations
Visible FY2026 positive rows checked4Year-3 continuations of 2024 awards, $960K to $1M each
Visible 2025 rows checkedMany $0 actionsContinuation or administrative actions need careful reading
Current track splitPDI and IANew clinic build and existing CCBHC expansion are different routes
Grant scaleUp to $1M per year in the current SAMHSA descriptionBudget planning must match certification work, not ordinary operations

According to SAMHSA's CCBHC Expansion Grants page (opens in a new tab), HHS has supported CCBHC development through the SAMHSA CCBHC Expansion Grant Program, established in 2018. According to SAMHSA, the current expansion grant structure includes Planning, Development and Implementation grants for providers building new CCBHC clinics and Improvement and Advancement grants for existing CCBHCs. According to SAMHSA SM-22-012 (opens in a new tab), eligible CCBHC-IA applicants included existing CCBHC Medicaid demonstration sites, existing CCBHC-Expansion recipients, or state-certified CCBHCs. According to HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.696 (opens in a new tab), public rows list recipient name, state, award number, award title, and action amount, while the listing page itself showed $1,693,227,389 in total assistance from FY2008 to present when checked.

Where official sources stop: SAMHSA explains the model and grant tracks. TAGGS lists public award actions. Neither source tells a clinic whether CCBHC status is the right operating model, whether the clinic can staff crisis services, or whether a state payment route exists. This guide adds the applicant decision screen.

CCBHC winner history can mislead clinics that only want a SAMHSA grant. The real question is whether the organization is ready for the CCBHC model. A clinic can win planning money and still be in trouble if it cannot meet access, crisis, care coordination, quality, and billing requirements.

2026 CCBHC Recipient Rows Visible In TAGGS

This table shows selected first-page TAGGS rows. It is a public sample, not the full export. According to USAspending.gov (opens in a new tab) award records, the four FY2026 rows are year-3 continuation actions on awards whose project period runs from April 30, 2024 to April 29, 2028; each award totals about $3.0 million to date. They show who is still funded, not who won a new FY2026 award.

Funding FYRecipientStateAward numberAward titleTAGGS action amount
2026 (year-3 continuation)Southern California Health & Rehabilitation ProgramCAH79SM089021SCHARP CCBHC Crenshaw$1,000,000
2026 (year-3 continuation)Aroostook Mental Health Services, Inc.MEH79SM088894AMHC CCBHC Improvement and Advancement$1,000,000
2026 (year-3 continuation)Berrien Mental Health AuthorityMIH79SM088983Berrien Mental Health Authority Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic$960,951
2026 (year-3 continuation)Southeast IncOHH79SM089102Southeast CCBHC IA$999,988
2025Fairbanks Native Association, Inc.AKH79SM089116Athabascan Behavioral Health Clinic$0
2025Horizon Health and Wellness, Inc.AZH79SM089455Yuma Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic$0
2025Terros IncAZH79SM088864Terros Health CCBHC IA$0
2025The Alliance for Community WellnessCAH79SM086697La Familia CCBHC project$0

The $0 rows are not useless. They are a warning. TAGGS action rows can include actions that do not add new money in that row. A clinic should not scrape a page, sum every row, and call that total grant funding. For CCBHC work, the source unit matters as much as the recipient name.

Next route: Pair this page with the CCBHC grants guide, SAMHSA grant programs guide, mental health grants guide, federal grants for nonprofits, and the nonprofit grant database.

Looking for your next grant?

About once a week, we email a short list of open grant calls with real deadlines from different funders. It lists open calls only.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

What The Winner Pattern Means For Applicants

PatternApplicant readAction before writing
Public, nonprofit, and community behavioral health recipients appear oftenThe route fits serious provider infrastructure, not small side projectsMap service lines and governance
IA and PDI titles appear separatelyExisting CCBHCs and new-build providers are not in the same lanePick track before budgeting
Many rows sit near $1MBudget should fund CCBHC criteria work, staffing, reporting, and access gapsBuild a gap budget, not a wish list
State pattern is wideState certification and Medicaid context still matterCall state behavioral health and Medicaid leads
$0 action rows appearAward action data needs interpretationCheck award detail before using totals

The bad fit is a clinic that treats CCBHC money as ordinary operating relief. The better fit is a provider that can show a credible path to CCBHC criteria, 24/7 crisis response, DCO agreements, data reporting, and a payment model beyond the grant.

For example, a hypothetical outpatient nonprofit with no mobile crisis capacity, no Medicaid cost-reporting discipline, and no state certification path should wait. A provider with crisis partnerships, state backing, billing depth, and a one-year criteria work plan would be much closer to a strong CCBHC application.

What SAMHSA CCBHC Winner Lists Don't Tell You

SourceWhat it provesWhat it does not decide
SAMHSA CCBHC Expansion Grants (opens in a new tab)Grant tracks and current program historyWhether the clinic is ready for CCBHC operations
SAMHSA SM-22-012 (opens in a new tab)IA eligibility and award structure for that announcementWhether a new cycle is open today
SAMHSA SM-22-002 (opens in a new tab)PDI route contextWhether a provider can meet criteria within one year
HHS TAGGS 93.696 (opens in a new tab)Recipient, state, award number, title, action amountTotal grant value or source sustainability
SAMHSA Grants Dashboard (opens in a new tab)Open, current, and past SAMHSA grant searchState certification readiness

Grantsights data adds the public route screen: source unit, visible recipient pattern, $0 action caveat, track split, and apply, wait, or skip guidance.

6 Apply, Wait, Or Skip Checks

DecisionPass signalStop signal
Apply for PDIThe clinic can meet CCBHC criteria within the required periodThe plan is a general service expansion
Apply for IAThe clinic already meets state CCBHC certification or the listed routeThe clinic is not certified and cannot show track eligibility
WaitCrisis service, DCO, billing, or reporting gaps are fixableThe gap budget is still unknown
Use a state routeState Medicaid or demonstration support is clearer than a grantNo state path exists and grant funding would expire
Use another SAMHSA grantNeed is narrower, such as youth, SUD, crisis, or peer supportCCBHC model is broader than the actual problem
Skip for nowBoard cannot support the operating changeThe clinic needs short-term cash, not a new model

5 CCBHC Readiness Screens Before A Grant Draft

According to SAMHSA, CCBHC expansion grants include PDI and IA tracks. That split should be the first applicant screen, because a provider building toward CCBHC status has a different risk profile than a provider already certified as a CCBHC.

ScreenPDI applicant questionIA applicant question
CertificationCan the clinic meet criteria within the required window?Is certification already documented?
Crisis servicesCan 24/7 response be staffed and paid for?Are crisis services already operating at CCBHC standard?
DCO partnersAre signed partner roles realistic?Are partner agreements current and monitored?
Quality reportingCan the clinic collect required measures?Are data systems already reporting reliably?
Payment modelWhat happens when the grant period ends?Does state Medicaid or another payer sustain the model?

For example, a provider with crisis staffing, Medicaid billing experience, and a state certification trail looks different from a counseling nonprofit that wants a grant to hire more therapists. Both may serve real needs. Only the first may fit the CCBHC route without major redesign.

According to TAGGS, the visible FY2026 CCBHC continuation rows checked by Grantsights included action amounts near $1M. A $1M action can help a provider close a defined criteria gap, but it will not by itself make 24/7 crisis care, data reporting, and care coordination affordable after the grant period. Compare this page with the CCBHC grants guide and mental health grants guide before starting an IA or PDI draft.

4 Budget And Sustainability Warnings

According to SAMHSA's expansion-grant page, the program shifted in 2022 to tracks that can provide up to $1M per year. That amount can be large for a small nonprofit and still small for a full CCBHC operating change.

The first warning is crisis cost. A real mobile or 24/7 crisis path needs staffing, supervision, backup, technology, and coverage when staff are out. If the grant budget treats crisis work as one part-time position, the plan will likely fail after award.

The second warning is state payment. Some clinics can connect CCBHC status with Medicaid payment models. Others cannot. A provider in a state without a payment path may be building services that become hard to sustain after the SAMHSA period ends.

The third warning is partner proof. DCOs cannot be decorative. If the clinic relies on partners for required services, reviewers and post-award staff will expect roles, referrals, data sharing, and accountability to be real.

The fourth warning is grant substitution. CCBHC funding should not replace a narrower SAMHSA route when the need is only peer support, school services, crisis training, or SUD treatment expansion. Use the SAMHSA grant programs guide to compare the narrower path.

3 Real-World Recipient Reads From The TAGGS Sample

According to HHS TAGGS, Southern California Health & Rehabilitation Program had a visible FY2026 continuation row for a Crenshaw CCBHC project that began in 2024. Applicant read: urban access, behavioral health infrastructure, and clinic capacity can be part of the route, but the title alone does not prove total award value.

According to TAGGS, Aroostook Mental Health Services in Maine had a visible FY2026 continuation row for an Improvement and Advancement award that began in 2024. Applicant read: rural or less dense service areas can still appear in the award trail when the provider has the operating base for CCBHC work.

According to TAGGS, Berrien Mental Health Authority in Michigan had a visible action below $1M. Applicant read: public or quasi-public behavioral health authorities can be credible applicants, but the decision still turns on certification, crisis services, and sustainability.

How To Pull The Full Recipient List Yourself

This page gives the source method, visible TAGGS rows, grant-track caveats, and route interpretation. For the full list, export the TAGGS 93.696 rows and match each award number to its USAspending award record, which shows the project period start date. That separates new awards from continuations.

Use this page to decide whether CCBHC remains on the shortlist. If it does, check the free eligibility checker and the nonprofit grant database for narrower behavioral health routes before assigning grant staff.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I find SAMHSA CCBHC winners?

Use HHS TAGGS Assistance Listing 93.696 for public CCBHC Expansion Grants award-action rows, then verify the specific SAMHSA grant announcement and state certification route.

What does TAGGS show for 2026 CCBHC award rows?

The first visible FY2026 TAGGS rows include Southern California Health & Rehabilitation Program, Aroostook Mental Health Services, Berrien Mental Health Authority, and Southeast Inc. USAspending shows all four are year-3 continuation actions on awards that began April 30, 2024, not new FY2026 winners. When checked October 9, 2026, TAGGS showed $1,693,227,389 in total assistance for 93.696 since FY2008, with a FY2026 subtotal of $128,736,726.

Why do some CCBHC TAGGS rows show $0?

TAGGS rows are award actions. A $0 action can reflect a continuation or administrative action, so it should not be treated as the total grant value.

Who is a strong CCBHC grant fit?

Strong candidates have CCBHC certification readiness, crisis services, Medicaid billing depth, quality reporting, DCO agreements, and a path beyond grant-only funding.

Should every behavioral health clinic apply for CCBHC funding?

No. Clinics without certification readiness, crisis capacity, or state payment strategy should often wait or choose a narrower behavioral-health grant.

Last updated October 9, 2026. Corrected October 9, 2026: what changed. Published by Grantsights from public sources. See our editorial policy, how we build and check guides, corrections and how we make money.