Skip to content

USDA REAP Winners and Award History

By GrantsightsUpdated 5 official sourcesHow we checkCorrections

Quick Answer: USDA REAP winner history is best read from USDA Rural Development award charts, not from vendor sales decks.

Full answer and how we checked it

The January 10, 2025 USDA REAP and HBIIP award chart mixes REAP grants, REAP loans, and HBIIP rows, and the sample grants on this page match USASpending.gov records with November 2024 start dates. USDA's current REAP page said on June 18, 2026 that the agency was not accepting REAP grant applications while guaranteed loan applications may be submitted, so winner history should inform project prep, not imply an open grant window.

This guide is for: Farmers, rural small businesses, solar installers, lenders, energy auditors, and grant writers checking recent USDA REAP winners before deciding whether to apply, wait, finance, or skip.

Data note: Grantsights checked USDA Rural Development's REAP program page and USDA Rural Development award charts on June 18, 2026. The main public table on this page uses USDA's January 10, 2025 REAP and HBIIP chart. The chart combines REAP rows and HBIIP rows, so this page labels the source unit and does not treat every row as the same grant product.

In this guide (8 sections)
2025 REAP source signalUSDA chart valueApplicant meaning
Award units in the chartREAP grants, REAP loans, and HBIIP rowsAward history should not be read as grant-only funding
Sample grant rows checked in USASpending8 of 8 found under CFDA 10.868Public award history is deep enough for pattern review
Grant types in the sampleRenewable energy system (RES) and energy efficiency (EEI)Solar isn't the only funded project type
Current USDA source posturegrants not accepted, loans may be submittedTeams should separate award history from current filing path

According to USDA Rural Development's REAP program page (opens in a new tab), REAP can support renewable energy systems, energy efficiency improvements, guaranteed loans, grants, and combined grant-plus-loan structures. The same USDA page said on June 18, 2026 that the agency was not accepting REAP grant applications and that guaranteed loan applications may be submitted. According to the January 2025 USDA award chart (opens in a new tab), the checked public file lists grant and loan rows separately, so check the award type before reading any row as a grant. According to USDA's chart rows, named recipients include agricultural producers and rural businesses, not only solar developers.

Where official sources stop: USDA pages tell you eligible project categories and award rows. They do not tell a rural business whether a quote should be signed now, whether a guaranteed loan should carry the project, or whether the energy savings are strong enough to justify the application cost. This guide covers that decision layer.

REAP winner history is most useful after the eligibility and timing screen. Let the winner pattern change the budget and timing decision before it changes the application outline. A winner list can make the program look broad, but a weak file still fails if rural eligibility, agricultural producer status, energy documentation, vendor timing, or financing does not hold.

8 USDA REAP Winner Records From The January 2025 Chart

This table shows selected public rows from USDA's January 10, 2025 REAP and HBIIP chart. It is a public sample, not the full export. Amounts are the grant amounts in USASpending.gov award records for CFDA 10.868 (opens in a new tab), which all show November 2024 start dates; for BPL Hunting Club, USASpending shows $29,700.

StateRecipientRecipient typeProject signalAmount shown
ARHunters Pharmacy Inc.Rural businessRenewable energy system (RES grant)$184,097
ARJCA Farms PartnershipAgricultural producerDiesel irrigation pump motors replaced with electric motors$31,099
ARBearskin Farming Company Inc.Agricultural producerGrain drying and monitoring equipment replacement$486,170
ARBPL Hunting Club LLCRural business25.4 kW solar array$29,700
ARBlue Whale Data Analytics LLCRural businessRenewable energy system (RES grant)$337,485
ARCommercial Bank & Trust CompanyRural businessRenewable energy system (RES grant)$229,865
ARRalston Family Farms LLCAgricultural producerElectric heat pump for rice milling facility$85,640
ARAdam BootheAgricultural producerRenewable energy system (RES grant)$91,037

The sample shows why REAP is not only a solar page. Solar appears often, but USDA rows also show grain, irrigation, milling, lighting, and other energy-cost projects. The applicant question is not "did someone like me win?" The question is whether your project can document the same kind of energy-production or energy-savings claim.

According to USDA, REAP grants can cover up to 50 percent of total eligible project costs in some current funding contexts, while guaranteed loans can cover up to 75 percent of total eligible project costs. According to USDA's 2025 page, loans approved in Fiscal Year 2025 receive an 80 percent guarantee. Those source facts matter because a winner row can be a grant, a loan, or part of a larger capital plan.

Next route: Pair this winner-history page with the USDA REAP grants guide, USDA energy grants guide, renewable energy grants guide, small-business grants route, and grant search.

Looking for your next grant?

About once a week, we email a short list of open grant calls with real deadlines from different funders. It lists open calls only.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

What The Award Pattern Means

PatternWhat it provesApplicant decision
Farms and rural businesses both appearREAP is not limited to one applicant typeConfirm agricultural producer or rural small-business status first
Solar rows are commonRenewable energy systems are a frequent public patternStill require technical reports, quotes, and cost evidence
Irrigation and grain rows appearEnergy efficiency can be a real routeGet the energy audit or energy-savings calculation right
Amounts vary widelyProject size changes the budget storyDo not copy another recipient's request amount
Loan and grant totals are separateSource unit mattersModel cash flow without treating every row as free grant money

For example, one farm replacing diesel irrigation motors has a different proof file than one pharmacy installing solar. The farm needs energy-savings evidence tied to its agricultural operation. The pharmacy needs rural-business eligibility, location proof, quote support, and technical production estimates.

What Official Sources Don't Tell You About USDA REAP Winners

USDA award charts are useful, but they are not a scoring guide.

SourceWhat it provesWhat it does not decide
USDA REAP program page (opens in a new tab)Eligible project types, loan and grant structure, current program sourceWhether your next move should be grant prep, guaranteed loan, or wait
January 2025 USDA award chart (opens in a new tab)Named award rows, amounts, project descriptions, state examplesApplication volume, score, state competition, or full award file
USDA state office guidanceLocal contacts and state processWhether vendor economics work without a grant

Do not use award history as a shortcut around eligibility. REAP can be a strong fit for a farm, a rural grocery, a grain facility, or a rural manufacturer. It can be a poor fit for a residential homeowner, a nonprofit outside an eligible route, a business outside rural eligibility, or a project where the cash flow only works if a grant arrives fast.

Apply, Wait, Finance, Or Skip

DecisionPass signalStop signal
Apply when openEligibility, energy evidence, quote, SAM.gov, and match are readyThe project is still a vendor estimate with missing source documents
WaitGrant timing is uncertain but the project can holdThe vendor wants a signature before USDA source timing is clear
FinanceGuaranteed loan, tax-credit, or lender path works without grant cashThe debt service fails if no grant arrives
ResizeSmaller project still solves the energy problemThe full project is sized to maximize the grant rather than fit need
SkipAnother energy, tax, utility, state, or private route is cleanerREAP rules force the wrong applicant or project design

Use winner history to shape a question list, not to justify a pre-set project. Ask what each public row proves: recipient type, location, technology, amount, and claimed energy benefit. Then compare that evidence with your own file before spending money on vendor quotes or engineering work.

9-Point REAP Winner Checklist

Use this checklist before treating a winner row as a model for your own application.

CheckWhy it mattersWhat to collect
Applicant typeUSDA treats agricultural producers and rural small businesses differentlyTax return, rural address, SBA size notes, entity record
Project categoryRenewable energy and energy efficiency use different evidenceTechnical report or energy audit
Source unitUSDA chart rows can include grants, loans, and HBIIPAward-chart row, program label, amount column
Project amountA row amount does not prove your request should match itQuote, eligible-cost notes, match source
Energy output or savingsUSDA needs energy evidence, not only a purchase planProduction estimate, utility bills, engineer note
TimingREAP grant status can change by notice and ruleCurrent USDA page, state office notes
FinancingLoan, tax, and cash-flow routes can carry the gapLender letter, tax-credit analysis, cash plan
Construction statusStarting early can create eligibility riskContract terms, construction schedule, conditions
State office fitLocal process and workload can change timingState energy coordinator contact notes

According to USDA, REAP grants and guaranteed loans are both part of the official program structure. According to USDA, FY2025 guaranteed loans approved under REAP receive an 80 percent guarantee. According to USDA's June 18, 2026 source posture, grant applications were not being accepted while guaranteed loan applications could still be submitted. According to USDA's January 2025 chart, grant and loan rows are listed separately. According to USASpending, federal assistance award records can be searched separately from agency PDF award charts, which is useful when a team needs obligation dates or recipient identifiers.

The Grantsights data lesson is simple: a winner row should change the file you build. For example, one farm looking at irrigation motor rows should collect utility usage, diesel replacement costs, and motor specifications before thinking about narrative language. One rural data company looking at a solar row should collect load profile, system design, site control, and financing assumptions. A winner table that does not change the evidence checklist is just decoration.

Source Maintenance Notes

Grantsights checked the official USDA REAP page, USDA award chart PDFs, and USASpending source posture on June 18, 2026. Recheck the USDA page before using this article for an active application because REAP grant timing, loan guarantee terms, application windows, and rule references can change. Recheck the award chart before copying any row because USDA can publish additional charts, corrected files, or later funding rounds.

If a vendor cites a winner row, ask for the exact source file, row, award type, and project unit. If the row is a loan, HBIIP item, grant-plus-loan project, or older funding round, it may still be useful, but it should not be treated as proof of a current grant-only path.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I find USDA REAP winners?

Start with USDA Rural Development award charts and the official REAP program page, then verify whether a row is a grant, loan, or mixed program listing.

How many REAP awards were in the January 2025 USDA chart checked by Grantsights?

Grantsights couldn't open the January 10, 2025 USDA Rural Development REAP and HBIIP chart to recount its totals, so this page doesn't quote them. Open the chart on rd.usda.gov for the row count and grant and loan totals, and use USASpending.gov to confirm individual grant amounts.

Does a REAP winner list prove my project will be funded?

No. Winner history shows funded rows, not application volume, state competition, scoring, or the 2026 grant-award pause.

What types of applicants appear in REAP winner history?

Recent public samples include farms, rural businesses, pharmacies, banks, data companies, lodges, grain facilities, and other rural or agricultural energy users.

Should I apply for REAP in 2026?

Prepare only after checking USDA's current REAP status. On June 18, 2026, USDA's REAP page said the agency was not accepting REAP grant applications, while guaranteed loan applications could be submitted.

Last updated October 10, 2026. Corrected October 10, 2026: what changed. Published by Grantsights from public sources. See our editorial policy, how we build and check guides, corrections and how we make money.